Re: GP: contfrac() bug

Igor Schein on Mon, 6 May 2002 01:23:22 -0400

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GP: contfrac() bug

To: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>
Subject: Re: GP: contfrac() bug
From: Igor Schein <igor@txc.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 01:23:22 -0400
Cc: pari-dev list <pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0205051913470.29794-100000@geo>; from Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr on Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:14:20PM +0200
References: <200204300226.WAA30359@grail.cba.csuohio.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0205051913470.29794-100000@geo>
Reply-to: igor@txc.com

On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:14:20PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Michael Somos wrote:
> >      Using the up-to-the-minute CVS I find :
> > ? contfrac(x)
> >   ***   significant pointers are lost in gerepile !!! (please report)
> 
> A recently introduced typo. It's fixed now.

This one, however, isn't:

? contfrac(1/x)
  ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report

Thanks

Igor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GP: contfrac() bug
  - From: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>

References:
- Re: GP: contfrac() bug
  - From: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>

Prev by Date: GP: algdep() bug?
Next by Date: Re: GP: contfrac() bug
Previous by thread: Re: GP: contfrac() bug
Next by thread: Re: GP: contfrac() bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread