Re: get_ld patch

Ilya Zakharevich on Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:51:01 -0800

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: get_ld patch

To: PARI developers <pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: get_ld patch
From: Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@Math.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:51:01 -0800
In-reply-to: <20030204194337.GS25379@txc.com>
References: <20030204171654.GQ25379@txc.com> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0302041950080.25375-100000@geo> <20030204192735.GR25379@txc.com> <20030204194337.GS25379@txc.com>

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:43:37PM -0500, Igor Schein wrote:
> I would rather see standard CFLAGS or CCOPT.  I understand perfectly
> well other people who have pointed out autoconf's shortcomings in the
> past on this list, but one can't take away its merits as far as
> user-friendliness goes.

Personally, I see no user-friendliness.

Ilya

References:
- get_ld patch
  - From: Igor Schein <igor@txc.com>
- Re: get_ld patch
  - From: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>
- Re: get_ld patch
  - From: Igor Schein <igor@txc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: get_ld patch
Next by Date: Re: polredabs() observation
Previous by thread: Re: get_ld patch
Next by thread: Equality test with bitand
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread