Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior

Bill Allombert on Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:43:10 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior

To: Developers Pari <pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:43:10 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0309191753430.10548-100000@geo>
References: <20030919145858.GE1493@txc.com> <Pine.GSO.4.33.0309191753430.10548-100000@geo>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:55:04PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote:
> No, it's not proper.
> 
> Fixed in CVS [ make sure "raw" output format is chosen, not "prettymat" ].

It is my belief that the default(output) should not affect library
functions, only the way GP output result.

This mean we should provide alternative of print,etc for prettymat
format.

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
  - From: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>

References:
- peculiar Set/eval behavior
  - From: Igor Schein <igor@txc.com>
- Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
  - From: Karim BELABAS <Karim.Belabas@math.u-psud.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
Next by Date: performance comparison
Previous by thread: Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
Next by thread: Re: peculiar Set/eval behavior
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread