Re: factor_add_primes logic

Jeroen Demeyer on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:23:06 +0100

Re: factor_add_primes logic

To: pari-dev <pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: factor_add_primes logic
From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:59:09 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:23:06 +0100
In-reply-to: <20090323225200.GL21664@yellowpig>
Mailing-list: contact pari-dev-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <49C76B98.7080906@cage.ugent.be> <20090323134320.GF21664@yellowpig> <49C797EB.9040604@cage.ugent.be> <20090323225200.GL21664@yellowpig>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20090109)

Bill Allombert wrote:

The point of factor_add_primes as you described, scenarii 1 and 2.

But my question remains: why would you only want to support scenarios 1and 2 and NOT scenario 3?

I agree that the current implementation is not perfect, but that is adifferent issue, independent from the above question.


Jeroen.

References:
- factor_add_primes logic
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: factor_add_primes logic
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: factor_add_primes logic
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: factor_add_primes logic
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>