|Bill Allombert on Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:50:40 +0100|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory|
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-01-28 15:48, Bill Allombert wrote: > >This works fine with --disable-mmap. > > Why don't you do that then? Emscripten needs to emulate mmap() somehow and I > guess that it doesn't fully support the non-trivial usage introduced by this > patch. I don't think that this is a problem, the simple PARI stack model > with --disable-mmap should be sufficient. Giving up on mmap on emscripten after it worked fine for one year would not be very constructive. I already spend quite a bit of time investigating why ellinit("11a1") did not work anymore. At the very least, the difference of speed and behaviour of --disable-mmap and --enable-mmap on emscripten would need to be clearly established. Cheers, Bill.