Re: New ECPP interface

Bill Allombert on Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:55:04 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New ECPP interface

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: New ECPP interface
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:55:00 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:55:04 +0100
In-reply-to: <24C5FBDF-9491-43C0-8C75-A1D66EB51937@grok.ltd.uk>
Mail-followup-to: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
References: <20180214210437.GD7705@yellowpig> <20180214213639.GB90113@math.u-bordeaux.fr> <24C5FBDF-9491-43C0-8C75-A1D66EB51937@grok.ltd.uk>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:45:18PM +0000, James Wanless wrote:
> All coolness... slight request (if you deem it appropriate too)
> Could we have some sort of option to retain a pure 100% ecpp certificate,
> even once P-1 capability is added? [which I recognise will in general speed
> up certification]

Could you elaborate ? What is the problem with primo-style certificate
that use both ECPP and P-1 ?

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New ECPP interface
  - From: James Wanless <james@grok.ltd.uk>

References:
- New ECPP interface
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: New ECPP interface
  - From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: New ECPP interface
  - From: James Wanless <james@grok.ltd.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: New ECPP interface
Next by Date: Re: New ECPP interface
Previous by thread: Re: New ECPP interface
Next by thread: Re: New ECPP interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread