Bill Allombert on Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:11:02 +0100


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Vector operation missing (?) vecmult() 

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 06:30:34PM -0800, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> The semantic is “concatenate n copies of the given vector (or rows of
> a matrix).  An extra argument (default 1) for multiplicity of
> concatenation of columns-in-a-matrix.
> 
>   It is unclear which direction of catenation is better by default for
>   matrices!  (I needed this only for vectors so far…)

Maybe you could be interested in matconcat ? 

Cheers,
Bill.