|Bill Allombert on Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:13:07 +0200|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote: > 2014-07-08 9:13 GMT+02:00 Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux.fr>: > > > No. The semantics of "==" is fuzzy (because it must apply to all pairs > > of PARI objects and decide whether they should be "mathematically" > > equal, which leaves plenty of room for ambiguities and abuse), > > I'd go so far as to say that understanding what "x==y" means is the > hardest step, causing the most logical bugs, in the transition from > any previous language you knew (except maybe APL) to Pari/GP. If you are translating code, you can use === instead. Cheers, Bill.