Brad Klee on Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:19:16 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Function Typing |
Hi Pari users, Typing "?" lists: "8: TRANSCENDENTAL functions", and typing "?8" lists: "... hypergeom ... sqrt ..." ( on v2.12 ). Of course f(x) = sqrt(x) satisfies x - f^2 = 0, so it is algebraic rather than transcendental. The type of "hypergeom" depends on parameter values. Ex. g(x) = hypergeom([1,1],[1],x), then (1-x)*g(x) - 1 = 0, also see "Schwarz's list" ( awesome! ). We could change many of these TRANSCENDENTAL functions to HOLONOMIC or D-FINITE. This is not just an organizational question. Input "?cos" returns "cos(x): cosine of x." This is okay for an untyped, common function. But if we type "cos" appropriately, then we can have a function "def" such that: def(cos) = [ F'' + F = 0, F = 1 + O(x^2) ] \\ human readable def(cos) = [ [1, 0, 1] , [1,0] ] \\ minimal This is not much extra data, and actually more helpful than current implementation of "?". In the end "def" can even be computed at runtime. For "?besselk" or "?besselj", it would be more clear to have a "def" function, rather than having to compare with Mathworld or Wikipedia or the Source. Is there any interest in implementing function typing along with differential defining relations? Thanks, Brad