Re: parforstep()

Bill Allombert on Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:50:53 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: parforstep()

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: parforstep()
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:45:55 +0200
References: <CAJkPp5NSnmLfLUG+py3_r6gBqp_QMA7hUChr_MhaW_jP_mixqw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:12:36AM -0400, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> Is there a particular reason why parforstep() function is missing?
> I'm surprised to see parforprimestep() but not parforstep().

Mostly because it is annoying to duplicate every forxxx functions with
parforxxx versions...

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: parforstep()
  - From: Max Alekseyev <maxale@gmail.com>

References:
- parforstep()
  - From: Max Alekseyev <maxale@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: parforstep()
Next by Date: Re: parforstep()
Previous by thread: parforstep()
Next by thread: Re: parforstep()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread