| Bill Allombert on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:49:50 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: another simple question |
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:45:40PM -0700, American Citizen wrote: > Recently, we saw a point with thousands of digits posted with the question, > what elliptic curve might have this point? > > The answer was to use lindep to determine the elliptic curve, and so > everything went fine. > > However, I am dubious that this general approach using lindep on [y^2, xy, > y, x^3, x^2, x, 1] will work when we have points of lesser heights. > > Suppose we have the point [1/2, 5/8] ?? Well, your example is interesting, since there is no elliptic curve in Weierstrass form with integral coefficient having this exact point! In any case, once you have found a small non-torsion point, it is easy enough to find a bigger one, so that the curve can be identified without doubt. But I apologize to have caused confusion with my little game. The question I expected you to ask was, how did I found such a large point on a curve with such a large conductor ? The answer is: by adapting Monsky/Robatino method to twists of the curve 11a1. So thanks again for pointing me to Robatino thesis. Cheers, Bill.