Bill Allombert on Mon, 08 Jul 2024 18:59:42 +0200


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Are there known false positives for GP ispseudoprime() ?


On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 06:13:12PM +0200, G. M.-S. wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 at 14:51, Bill Allombert <
> Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr> wrote:
> 
> >    There  are  no known composite numbers passing the above test,
> > although it is expected that infinitely many such numbers exist.   In
> >    particular,   all  composites  <= 2^{64} are correctly detected
> > (checked using
> >    http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/Pseudoprimes/index-2-to-64.html).
> >
> Just to say that this link is utterly obsolete, as are the 2 linked
> references mentioned in it.
> Of course, I am not saying that the information is no longer valid.

The link still provide psps-below-2-to-64.txt.bz2 
which is all that matters.

Do you have a better link ?

Cheers,
BIll.