|
Bill Allombert on Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:52:11 +0200
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: is there a way to globally rely on ispseudoprime() for primality testing?
|
- To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
- Subject: Re: is there a way to globally rely on ispseudoprime() for primality testing?
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 19:52:07 +0200
- Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 19:52:11 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=math.u-bordeaux.fr; s=2022; t=1727977929; bh=9mQhuFfr9QRsmjrQWlV0kWIhOY5xWrUi3gc8Ca+ScA0=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qGtZTiAUcXMSdd+cgk9coAwEK/Qadn9Pe8PrALrWG0F2sYvqCZKlqvDKAd6jhUUok Bu6THvBX6ZGZga21rPZeis3Th/97j4mYrvVx79E/rWuqoMF5yxN9O9cexh/XCiimRG TANx8WaKF2dxGfvIa7kXQiacdH3GTqeX7fnEDUFnjX5y63yf7mVHG5xuZ9oNZfK2ZH hgrXwLeR6ipMXYKh/DHF97Wra0dpugkVhQoxIavJWUESFqypiShY7vr3LtviN3Pe+0 76omh3BbKcy15QD59LQhxBl2BaLTyhPsYhg5NorDrNOhFp5vXnUidfXzGRc/SNDRBr 3S5721ZvG2CvQeXWoy2V5tl2F/wLDoyW/WL9pFRiI1mIOhzciinhImpet/iOUqeWT8 4dRwv1Bh27Qsaqk68SKOX0CrO4vH0CIWbumKPRT2Z9JBpDwxofapFBD2vr2tQeUWTR ANLHOlGXzWihcB3f4ZDQLre4k9sFXw3sPpV0OvyQOSKZsUoNIUc+HCoJfcr3Tiofxt HU2iSSuvCBRimLyXaGuVMR5dZXnmtC5VA+aKOMtpLGYbbk4509dKkGoNOCLjPN30A/ DSTFaeYvwtYF88fs6IHFHdT6yy6bADndQIvfDczOzRUIbqV/tsBPh0JteAHNbVXUMw f606XbHex57gqeoBWazHgYCg=
- In-reply-to: <CAJkPp5POSCkkCPReuWtvdKo6Z91y5YDhQkTxuWCp7GRW=9ogcA@mail.gmail.com>
- Mail-followup-to: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
- References: <CAJkPp5POSCkkCPReuWtvdKo6Z91y5YDhQkTxuWCp7GRW=9ogcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 01:45:06PM -0400, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like isprimepower() relies on isprime() - is there a way to make
> it use ispseudoprime() instead?
Use ispseudoprimepower ?
> In general, I'd like to have a global option that will use ispseudoprime()
> instead of isprime() everywhere where primality testing is needed. Is there
> such a thing?
Is there instance when it is not already the case that are problematic to you ?
The only default currently relevant is "factor_proven".
Cheers,
Bill