Ruud H.G. van Tol on Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:11:28 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: digits of a float |
On 2024-12-26 19:21, Loïc Grenié wrote:
On Thu 26 Dec, 2024, at 17:21, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote: [...] For Pi-digits, I am now using: pi_digits(n, p=20)= { my(u=10^(n+p-1), f(x, u)=my(n=1, q=u\x, r=q, s=1, t); while(t=(q\=(x*x))\(n+=2), r+=(s=-s)*t); r*4); digits((4*f(5, u) - f(239, u))\10^p); } \\ Machin-like, with p > the maximal number of consecutive 9-digits to be expected (A048940) Wouldn't floor be more adapted than round?
The code has an off-by-1 error. Corrected: pi_digits(n, p=20)= {my(u=10^(n+p), f(x, u)=my(n=1, q=u\x, r=q, s=1, t); while(t=(q\=(x*x))\(n+=2), r+=(s=-s)*t); r*4);
digits((4*f(5, u) - f(239, u))\10^(p+1)); } With a low value of p, the rounding shows: ? pi_digits( 769, 10 )[-10..-1] % [1, 3, 4, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8] :OK ? pi_digits( 763, 6 )[-4..-1] % [1, 3, 5, 0] :BAD ? pi_digits( 762, 7 )[-3..-1] % [1, 3, 5] :BAD (also invalidates the comment about what p is needed) -- Ruud