|
Bill Allombert on Thu, 17 May 2012 11:44:40 +0200
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
- Subject: Re: zetap
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:44:33 +0200
- References: <CAKDc=ZxJChWKrkmuyL92o8UWaM_Ac8zFF8otn5ZFvGtTCUpm-A@mail.gmail.com> <20120512162459.GA4507@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <CAKDc=Zw00vfRvqHfvyHRs427u6G5T6uRmvMt9UqYs1Le8xPgvw@mail.gmail.com> <20120514141254.GA25306@yellowpig> <CAKDc=Zx0rBBQ112dyc3UyXs63KMTW7qZFDwnmwDOtLWCDs7L-A@mail.gmail.com> <20120515194446.GI4506@yellowpig> <CAKDc=ZxKQr0Dp-KgumPnVn5Ok5pXWvnrWGdnx1QF5aK5ZmoZLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:32:53PM +0200, sou nonyma wrote:
> hello
> so i am currently searching to have only zeta on 3-adic numbers
> so with the formula i find that :
> zetap(s)=2*zetahurwitz(s,1/3)/p
> but i don't get the same answer as sage
> is this because of the formula?
I suggest you double check your function zetahurwitz.
Please give an example with what you get and what SAGE get so at least we can
compare.
Cheers,
Bill.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: zetap
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- References:
- zetap
- From: sou nonyma <sounonyma@gmail.com>
- Re: zetap
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: zetap
- From: sou nonyma <sounonyma@gmail.com>
- Re: zetap
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: zetap
- From: sou nonyma <sounonyma@gmail.com>
- Re: zetap
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: zetap
- From: sou nonyma <sounonyma@gmail.com>