Bill Allombert on Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:51:21 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: functions returning int with 'l' protocodes. |
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:31:19PM -0700, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:44:18PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Here is 'my first paragraph' that I was speaking about: > > > > For now, only output is neccessary. And since we are going to redesign > > the system, it is not a high priority to allow installed functions > > to take an int. Especially since there is no 't_INT to C int' conversions > > routines in GP. > > Why do I get an impression that when you say "we do not need it", you > mean "I do not need it"... My point is very simple: the manual > advocates using install() to reach, e.g., CRTL functions. And > currently, there is no way to do it on alpha. We need it for the next stable release (2.3), I fully agree. But here we are talking about fixing the CVS so that we can debug on alpha/ia64. Afterward, we can discuss of the forthcoming description system, what features is needed, and how they are going to be implemented. It is too soon to add new features to install. > > And yes, we are really going to redesign the system. You can download > > the description patch from <http://www.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~allomber/desc>. > > No, I can't. ;-) At least now. ;-) The URL is correct but the server is unreachable... Well I have copied everything at <http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/desc/> Note that this snapshot make no change to the prototype itself, since it would involve patching PARI, and there is no C code in this snapshot. Thanks for your interest, Cheers, Bill.